During my nine years inside the SEC's Division of Enforcement and three years as a Special Assistant United States Attorney prosecuting federal securities fraud, I built cases against the full spectrum of securities violations — market manipulation, insider trading, disclosure fraud, unregistered offerings, and reverse merger schemes. I understand how the government thinks, what it looks for, and how evidentiary records develop long before a company realizes it is under scrutiny.
The Enforcement Intelligence series exists because the most important decisions in a securities enforcement matter are made before the Wells Notice arrives — often before the company knows an investigation has opened. The pieces collected here are not marketing content. They are procedural and analytical explainers written from the perspective of someone who sat on the other side of the process: who decided which cases to open, how to build the evidentiary record, and when to recommend formal action.
Each article is designed to give issuers, their counsel, and their boards a clearer picture of how enforcement risk actually develops — not as a theoretical matter, but as a procedural reality that begins with specific triggers, follows identifiable patterns, and can be managed with the right counsel at the right stage.

Frederick M. Lehrer
Former SEC Enforcement Attorney · 9 Years, Division of Enforcement · SAUSA, S.D. Fla.
8 Articles · Enforcement Analysis · Former SEC Perspective
Most companies do not know they are under SEC scrutiny until the subpoena arrives. This piece maps the specific fact patterns — unusual trading volume, whistleblower tips, restatements, short-seller reports, and Form 8-K anomalies — that cause the Division of Enforcement to open an informal inquiry. Understanding these triggers is the first line of defense.
The reverse merger structure attracted sustained SEC enforcement attention for over a decade, and the agency's institutional memory of those cases shapes how it reviews shell company transactions today. This analysis covers the structural vulnerabilities the SEC has historically exploited, the red flags staff look for in OTC-traded issuers, and what counsel must address before any reverse merger closes.
This piece dissects how the SEC builds a market manipulation case from the ground up — from the initial surveillance alert through trading pattern analysis, account tracing, and the coordination between the Division of Enforcement and the Department of Justice. Drawn from patterns observed across hundreds of enforcement matters, it explains what the government is actually looking for and how the evidentiary record develops.
Form 10 is the least understood registration pathway to public company status, and the SEC's review process for Form 10 filers is more rigorous than most issuers anticipate. This explainer covers what the staff examines, where disclosure deficiencies typically appear, and how a poorly managed Form 10 process can create the factual predicate for a later enforcement action.
Regulation D is not a safe harbor from enforcement — it is a conditional exemption, and the conditions matter. This piece traces the SEC's enforcement history under Rule 506, identifies the specific failure points that convert a facially exempt offering into an enforcement referral, and explains what the staff looks for when reviewing private placement materials and investor qualification records.
From a prosecutor's perspective, a company's prior correspondence with the Commission can become a central part of the record in a formal investigation. This piece explains how to approach comment letter responses strategically — not just as a disclosure exercise, but as a document that may one day be read by enforcement staff evaluating whether a fraud case exists.
Disclosure fraud in growth-stage companies rarely begins with deliberate intent to deceive. It typically begins with optimistic projections, followed by selective omissions, followed by affirmative misstatements — each step rationalised at the time, each step building the evidentiary record the SEC will later use. This case breakdown traces that progression and identifies the inflection points where counsel can intervene.
Insider trading cases are built on patterns, not single transactions. This piece explains the SEC's surveillance methodology, how trading data is correlated with material non-public information, how the government establishes the tipper-tippee chain, and how the DOJ coordinates with the SEC once a criminal referral is made. Understanding this process is essential for any company managing material information across its organization.
Former SEC Enforcement Attorney
The decisions made in the first days of an SEC inquiry determine the trajectory of the entire matter. Early intervention by counsel who understands how the Division of Enforcement builds its cases is the most effective risk management available.